Less

Boy · recorded 1881–1957

  • 1957last recorded
  • 1900best year

Most popular in 1900.

Last recorded in 1957. Fewer than five boys a year have been given it since, so it's a true rarity.

Checking your shortlist…

Compare

Meaning

We don’t have a verified meaning for Less.

We only publish meanings we can cite to a source you could check yourself. Most sites will give you one anyway; the ones you find elsewhere are often copied between sites without verification.

Its story

Popularity since 1881

0438618811900191919381957

Hover over or drag across the chart to see any year.

Per million boys born. Years with fewer than five births are not in the record, so the line breaks rather than dropping to zero.
See the 41 recorded years as a table
Less, per million boys born. Years absent from the table had fewer than five births.
YearPer million
188150
188444
188945
189543
189744
190086
190384
190447
190538
190638
190748
191026
191216
191316
191412
191513
19168
191710
19187
191913
19207
19215
192313
19247
19257
19265
19296
19307
19315
19325
19335
19355
19376
19385
19395
19404
19473
19483
19543
19563
19573

Where it’s loved

Most popular in these states

Less isn’t concentrated in any one state. Either it’s spread evenly, or no state reaches the 25 births over three years needed before a rate means anything.

More like it

More like Less

The numbers

Every figure

Births in 1957
7
Rank in 1957
#3,257
How rare
1 in 308,176 boys
Since 1881
281

Less was last recorded in 1957. Fewer than five boys have been given the name in any year since, which is the point below which the record stops reporting.

Most popular in 1900, at 86 per million boys born.

There isn’t enough data for a ten-year trend: Less doesn’t appear in both ends of that window.

Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made.