Where Evander is used most

Alaska: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateAK no dataAlabama: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateAL no dataArkansas: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateAR no dataArizona: 28 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5AZ 28California: 119 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5CA 119Colorado: 2.0× the national rate — 32 births, 2023–2025CO 2.0×1Connecticut: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateCT no dataDistrict of Columbia: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateDC no dataDelaware: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateDE no dataFlorida: 60 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5FL 60Georgia: 28 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5GA 28Hawaii: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateHI no dataIowa: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateIA no dataIdaho: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateID no dataIllinois: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateIL no dataIndiana: 1.9× the national rate — 36 births, 2023–2025IN 1.9×3Kansas: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateKS no dataKentucky: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateKY no dataLouisiana: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateLA no dataMassachusetts: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateMA no dataMaryland: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateMD no dataMaine: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateME no dataMichigan: 27 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5MI 27Minnesota: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateMN no dataMissouri: 2.0× the national rate — 33 births, 2023–2025MO 2.0×2Mississippi: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateMS no dataMontana: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateMT no dataNorth Carolina: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNC no dataNorth Dakota: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateND no dataNebraska: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNE no dataNew Hampshire: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNH no dataNew Jersey: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNJ no dataNew Mexico: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNM no dataNevada: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateNV no dataNew York: 44 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5NY 44Ohio: 35 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5OH 35Oklahoma: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateOK no dataOregon: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateOR no dataPennsylvania: 1.5× the national rate — 48 births, 2023–2025PA 1.5×5Rhode Island: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateRI no dataSouth Carolina: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateSC no dataSouth Dakota: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateSD no dataTennessee: 31 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5TN 31Texas: 94 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5TX 94Utah: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateUT no dataVirginia: 27 births, 2023–2025 — not among the top 5VA 27Vermont: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateVT no dataWashington: 1.8× the national rate — 35 births, 2023–2025WA 1.8×4Wisconsin: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateWI no dataWest Virginia: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateWV no dataWyoming: Fewer than 25 recorded here in 2023–2025, not enough for a reliable rateWY no data
Numbered states are Evander’s top 5 by concentration, pooled over 2023–2025 against the national rate for boys. Hatched states have fewer than 25 recorded births in that window — not enough to compute a reliable rate, which is different from the name being uncommon there.
Top 5, by rank Enough data, not top 5 Insufficient data
Evander’s top 5 states by concentration
RankStateTimes the national rateBirths pooled
1Colorado2.0×32
2Missouri2.0×33
3Indiana1.9×36
4Washington1.8×35
5Pennsylvania1.5×48
See every state with enough data, not only the top 5
Every state with at least 25 pooled births of Evander, 2023–2025
StateBirths pooledIn the top 5?
California119No
Texas94No
Florida60No
Pennsylvania48Yes, #5
New York44No
Indiana36Yes, #3
Ohio35No
Washington35Yes, #4
Missouri33Yes, #2
Colorado32Yes, #1
Tennessee31No
Arizona28No
Georgia28No
Michigan27No
Virginia27No

Figures from the US Social Security Administration’s 2025 release. How these numbers are made. This link reproduces exactly what you see, so it’s safe to share.